Which of the following types of assessments helps measure reading capabilities?

The choice of all types of assessments as relevant to measuring reading capabilities is substantiated by the fact that each type serves distinct but complementary purposes in evaluating a student’s reading skills.

Informal assessments can take many forms, such as observations, checklists, and anecdotal records, which provide insight into a student’s reading behaviors and strategies. These assessments are often used in day-to-day classroom activities and can help educators identify specific areas where a student may need support.

Formative assessments are integral in monitoring student progress throughout the learning process. These assessments, which can include quizzes, interactive reading activities, or regular check-ins, enable teachers to adjust instruction and provide feedback tailored to individual student needs. This constant monitoring is beneficial in gauging reading development over time.

Summative assessments, typically conducted at the end of a unit or term, assess the overall mastery of skills, including reading capabilities. Standardized tests or comprehensive evaluations fall under this category and help determine whether students have met specific learning goals.

By recognizing that all these various assessment types contribute uniquely to understanding a student's reading abilities, the option reflecting that all assessments are relevant is the most comprehensive and accurate choice. Each assessment type directs attention to different aspects of learning and offers valuable information for educators, ultimately supporting student